Traditional publishing is a partnership, but it's not a mind-reading exercise.
So, the answer first. A traditional publisher normally handles the ISBNs, the production files, the metadata feed to retailers and wholesalers, distribution, and the trade review submissions. You should still verify every one of those, because nobody else is checking that what went out matches your book. This guide is for traditionally and hybrid published authors who want to know which side of the line each task sits on, what to ask for, and what nobody is doing.
Here's how mine worked. Wiley controlled the ISBNs, the files, the metadata feeds, distribution, and the submissions to the big trade review outlets. I controlled my website, my own outreach, my subject-matter relationships, and the long-term attention the book would get after the launch team moved on to the next season's titles.
Between those two areas is a large, quiet category: things everyone assumes someone else handled.
I didn't duplicate any of Wiley's work, and nothing important got dropped. I trusted the process, and it worked out. But a lot was happening on my behalf to get No Loose Ends to print that I couldn't see, and what I wanted the whole time was a simple list showing what they were doing, what I was doing, and what nobody was doing. This site is that list. This guide is the short version.
The fix isn't for you to redo the publisher's work. It's to give every task an owner, know the timing, and save the confirmation when it's done.
The three actions you need
I sort every publisher-related task into one of three buckets.
Do
You own it. Complete it or hand it to someone specific.
Ask
The publisher probably owns it, but you need to understand the plan, the timing, or whether your book is even eligible.
Verify
Someone says it's done. Go look at the actual record, link, identifier, confirmation, or finished product.
"Handled" and "verified" aren't the same status. I'm a lawyer, so I'll admit that distinction is a professional habit. It's also the most useful habit I brought to publishing.
Who usually handles what?
This table reflects common practice, not a universal rule. Your contract and your actual publishing team control. (Yes, I'm telling you to read your contract. I'd be a poor attorney if I didn't.)
| Task | Publisher usually handles | Author should do | Author should verify |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISBNs | Assigns ISBNs to publisher-issued editions and formats | Record every ISBN | Correct title, format, imprint, and publication date are attached to each ISBN |
| Copyright page | Produces and approves the page | Review name, notices, credits, and identifiers | Final printed page is accurate |
| Copyright registration | Depends on the contract and publisher | Read the agreement and ask who files | Registration was filed and the record is retained |
| LCCN or CIP | Publisher applies when eligible | Ask whether the title qualifies and whether an application was made | Number and cataloging data appear correctly |
| BISAC and other subject codes | Chooses and distributes codes | Suggest accurate categories and explain the audience | Codes describe the book rather than merely chasing a popular category |
| ONIX metadata | Publisher or distributor sends the feed | Supply accurate descriptions, biography, and contributor information | Retail and library-facing records reflect the current information |
| Cover and interior files | Publisher controls production | Review carefully during the approval process | Finished files and physical copies match approved material |
| Advance reading copies | Publisher determines format and quantity | Identify important recipients and request copies early | Timing and inventory are sufficient for priority submissions |
| Publishers Weekly submission | Publisher or publicist for traditionally published titles | Ask whether and when it will be submitted | Submission route and status are recorded |
| Booklist submission | Publisher | Ask whether the book fits and will be submitted | Submission occurred early enough |
| Library Journal submission | Publisher or authorized publicity team | Ask about the plan | Submission materials and timing are confirmed |
| Kirkus editorial consideration | Publisher | Ask whether the title will be submitted | Digital galley was sent under current guidelines |
| NetGalley | Publisher or publicist commonly manages it | Help identify readers and amplify responsibly | Listing, dates, metadata, and feedback plan are correct |
| Edelweiss+ | Publisher controls catalog and access | Review the public listing and alert the team to errors | Cover, description, publication data, and review-copy availability are accurate |
| Distribution | Publisher or distributor | Understand the channels relevant to the book | The book is actually orderable through promised channels |
| Retail listings | Publisher supplies metadata; retailers display it | Audit the customer-facing pages | Formats, price, date, cover, description, and author association are correct |
| Library wholesaler availability | Publisher or distributor | Ask which library suppliers carry the book | The book can be found through the relevant channel |
| Major publisher-controlled awards | Publisher decides what to enter | Identify good fits and raise them before deadlines | Entry, category, fee, and result are recorded |
| Author website | Usually the author | Build and maintain it | Book page and author information stay current |
| Amazon Author Central | Author | Claim and maintain the profile | All editions link to the right author |
| Goodreads Author Program | Author | Claim and maintain the profile | Correct books and editions are associated |
| BookBub author profile | Author | Claim when eligible | Bio, image, and book data are accurate |
| Subject-specific outreach | Shared, but author expertise is especially valuable | Identify associations, experts, podcasts, and publications | Outreach is coordinated with publicity plans |
| Local outreach | Often author-led | Contact local media, bookstores, libraries, and organizations appropriately | Publisher knows about meaningful opportunities |
| Long-term record maintenance | Usually the author | Continue audits after the campaign ends | New reviews, awards, formats, and corrections are reflected |
What publishers are built to do
A traditional publisher brings infrastructure most first-time authors don't have. That includes editing, design, production, printing, metadata, distribution, sales, rights, and the submission channels authors often can't use directly. The publisher still decides how much publicity and marketing a particular title receives.
That's an enormous amount of work, and I appreciated all of it. Most first-time authors picture one editor. I ended up working with a senior acquisitions editor, a managing editor on the trade side, an accounts manager for corporate sales, and a sales director for retail and wholesale channel partners. Each of them was doing something for the book that I only partly understood at the time.
The trouble starts when "the publisher does marketing" gets heard as "the publisher will pursue every useful audience, profile, award, correction, library, podcast, and long-term opportunity connected to my book." No reasonable publishing arrangement means that.
A publisher has a list. You have a book. You'll almost always have more time, more personal relationships, more subject expertise, and more long-term interest in this one title than anyone else on the team. That isn't a knock on the team. It's arithmetic.
What to ask early
Ask these before the submission windows get urgent:
- Who is the day-to-day contact for editorial, production, publicity, marketing, sales, and rights?
- When will the title enter the catalog and metadata feed?
- When will digital and physical advance copies be available?
- Which trade review publications will receive the book?
- Will the book be available through NetGalley or Edelweiss+?
- Which distributors and wholesalers will carry it?
- Is the title eligible for CIP, and has an LCCN been requested?
- Which BISAC codes were selected?
- Which awards does the publisher plan to enter?
- What can I submit independently without interfering with the publisher's efforts?
- Who corrects retailer and metadata errors?
- What files and materials may I use on my website and in a media kit?
- How should requests for review copies, events, bulk sales, and rights inquiries be routed?
Don't send all thirteen in one frantic email two weeks before publication. Put them on the calendar and ask the right person at the right time.
The one I wish I'd asked months earlier is number 4. I never asked which trade review outlets received my galley. By the time I thought to wonder, the prepublication windows had closed. Nothing bad happened. I just don't know what did or didn't happen, and I'd rather know.
A publisher-confirmation message that works
Keep it cooperative and specific:
Hi [Name], I am keeping a record of the publishing details for [Book Title] and wanted to confirm whether [item] has been completed or submitted. If so, could you send me the relevant identifier, link, date, or confirmation? I want to make sure I am supporting the team without duplicating anyone's work. Thank you.
That's much easier to answer than "Are we doing everything we can?"
What not to do
Don't submit the same book twice
If the publisher submitted the title to a trade publication, don't create a second submission through another route. Publishers Weekly expressly tells self-published authors not to submit through BookLife if their publisher has already submitted the title. See the Publishers Weekly and BookLife FAQ (opens in a new tab).
Don't change public metadata without finding the source
Wiley maintains the book's product listing and sends its metadata to retailers. I maintain my Author Central page, which is a different thing: it holds my photo, my biography, and which books are attached to my name, not the cover, price, availability, format, or description on a product page. When No Loose Ends won an award, I couldn't add it to the listing myself. I told Wiley, and they updated the feed. If the same wrong description shows up on five stores, that's one upstream record, not five separate typos. Fixing a downstream page may be temporary. Ask who controls the publisher or distributor record.
Don't promise media coverage or reviews
A submission isn't a review. Sending a book isn't coverage. Paying a review service doesn't buy a positive review. Track each step for what it is.
Don't treat silence as confirmation
"I assume the publicist sent it" isn't a record. Ask once, politely, and save the answer.
Don't surprise the team with a conflicting campaign
Coordinate major announcements, discounts, retailer promotions, embargoed coverage, events, and award entries. Independent initiative is useful. Crossed wires aren't.
What you uniquely bring
You have access the publisher can't reproduce. You have the story behind the book and the subject expertise. You have professional networks, local relationships, the organizations mentioned in the book, potential bulk buyers, speaking opportunities, and existing clients, readers, students, or members. You also have two things no publisher can schedule: the patience to follow a niche opportunity for months, and the willingness to maintain the record years after launch.
For No Loose Ends, some of the most useful lessons came from asking basic questions of the people who actually make decisions. Librarians explained how their acquisition processes worked. Metadata research led me into identifiers and authority records I'd never heard of. Awards became useful only after I connected them back to the book's public record.
The lesson wasn't that a publisher should have done every one of those things. The lesson was that I needed a complete map.
A better shared system
For each task, save:
- Default responsible party
- Actual assignee
- Due date
- Current status
- Date submitted
- Confirmation number or link
- Result
- Verification date
- Notes and follow-up date
Useful statuses include:
- Not Started
- In Progress
- Waiting on Publisher
- Waiting on Someone Else
- Submitted
- Complete
- Skipped
- Not Applicable
Keep the result separate from the status. An award submission can be Complete while the result is still Pending. A review submission can be Complete even if the publication declines coverage.
Frequently asked questions
Does a traditional publisher market every book?
Traditional publishers do marketing and publicity work, but the scope varies by publisher, imprint, title, budget, timing, and opportunity. Ask for the actual plan rather than relying on a general expectation.
Should an author hire a separate publicist?
Sometimes. First understand what the publisher is doing, when it begins, and what gaps actually exist. A second publicist should complement the publisher's work and talk to the team.
Can a traditionally published author submit directly to review publications?
It depends on the outlet. Several major trade publications expect the publisher or publicist to submit traditionally published titles. Follow each outlet's current rules and avoid duplicate submissions.
Who corrects an Amazon or retailer listing?
Often the publisher or distributor controls the metadata feed, while the retailer controls the final display. You can report visible errors, but the lasting correction usually has to happen upstream. In my case that means an email to Wiley.
What if the publisher says an item does not apply?
Record the answer and mark it Not Applicable or Skipped with a note. A deliberate decision is useful. An unspoken assumption isn't.
Keep the shared record
Use the free Author Checklist, or create a free Author Profile and add your book, one payment, to keep the work in one place.
Sources and further reading
Last fact-checked September 13, 2026. Submission rules, fees, and deadlines change. The official source controls.
